Rajaratnam - Rajaratnam's kidney transplant could cost taxpayers $300,000

15 whether the application would have been granted in any event.

But see Wilson v.

Only in the imaginations of those who would never be entrusted with billions let alone millions can traders blithely put capital to work without a reason for doing so.

Subsequent accusations of have been addressed by two commissions of inquiry and have brought down at least one national government.

In this case, the Judge Holwell s view that the SEC investigation was clearly critical is the only basis for his conclusion that the government omitted certain information about that investigation with reckless disregard for the truth.

1996 , the District Court stated that with respect to material omissions from the March 7, 2008 affidavit, Rajaratnam must prove that the drafters of the affidavit either intentionally omitted the information or that the omitted information was clearly critical to the affidavit, thereby raising an inference of 19 recklessness.